Biography

ACD301적중율높은시험덤프자료, ACD301참고자료

Appian ACD301 시험을 보시는 분이 점점 많아지고 있는데 하루빨리 다른 분들보다 Appian ACD301시험을 패스하여 자격증을 취득하는 편이 좋지 않을가요? 자격증이 보편화되면 자격증의 가치도 그만큼 떨어지니깐요. Appian ACD301덤프는 이미 많은분들의 시험패스로 검증된 믿을만한 최고의 시험자료입니다.

DumpTOP 의 Appian인증 ACD301시험에 도전장을 던지셨나요? 현황에 만족하지 않고 열심히 하는 모습에 박수를 보내드립니다. Appian인증 ACD301시험을 학원등록하지 않고 많은 공부자료 필요없이DumpTOP 에서 제공해드리는 Appian인증 ACD301덤프만으로도 가능합니다. 수많은 분들이 검증한Appian인증 ACD301덤프는 시장에서 가장 최신버전입니다.가격도 친근하구요.

>> ACD301적중율 높은 시험덤프자료 <<

ACD301적중율 높은 시험덤프자료 시험준비에 가장 좋은 시험 기출문제와 예상문제 모음 자료

Appian ACD301 덤프로 많은 분들께서 Appian ACD301시험을 패스하여 자격증을 취득하게 도와드렸지만 저희는 자만하지않고 항상 초심을 잊지않고 더욱더 퍼펙트한Appian ACD301덤프를 만들기 위해 모든 심여를 기울일것을 약속드립니다.

Appian ACD301 시험요강:

주제
소개

주제 1

• Project and Resource Management: This section of the exam measures skills of Agile Project Leads and covers interpreting business requirements, recommending design options, and leading Agile teams through technical delivery. It also involves governance, and process standardization.

주제 2

• Extending Appian: This section of the exam measures skills of Integration Specialists and covers building and troubleshooting advanced integrations using connected systems and APIs. Candidates are expected to work with authentication, evaluate plug-ins, develop custom solutions when needed, and utilize document generation options to extend the platform’s capabilities.

주제 3

• Proactively Design for Scalability and Performance: This section of the exam measures skills of Application Performance Engineers and covers building scalable applications and optimizing Appian components for performance. It includes planning load testing, diagnosing performance issues at the application level, and designing systems that can grow efficiently without sacrificing reliability.

주제 4

• Data Management: This section of the exam measures skills of Data Architects and covers analyzing, designing, and securing data models. Candidates must demonstrate an understanding of how to use Appian’s data fabric and manage data migrations. The focus is on ensuring performance in high-volume data environments, solving data-related issues, and implementing advanced database features effectively.

 

최신 Lead Developer ACD301 무료샘플문제 (Q25-Q30):

질문 # 25
You are taking your package from the source environment and importing it into the target environment.
Review the errors encountered during inspection:
What is the first action you should take to Investigate the issue?

• A. Check whether the object (UUD ending in 7t00000i4e7a) is included in this package
• B. Check whether the object (UUID ending in 18028931) is included in this package
• C. Check whether the object (UUID ending in 25606) is included in this package
• D. Check whether the object (UUID ending in 18028821) is included in this package

정답：A

설명：
The error log provided indicates issues during the package import into the target environment, with multiple objects failing to import due to missing precedents. The key error messages highlight specific UUIDs associated with objects that cannot be resolved. The first error listed states:
"'TEST_ENTITY_PROFILE_MERGE_HISTORY': The content [id=uuid-a-0000m5fc-f0e6-8000-9b01-011c48011c48, 18028821] was not imported because a required precedent is missing: entity [uuid=a-0000m5fc-f0e6-8000-9b01-011c48011c48, 18028821] cannot be found..." According to Appian's Package Deployment Best Practices, when importing a package, the first step in troubleshooting is to identify the root cause of the failure. The initial error in the log points to an entity object with a UUID ending in 18028821, which failed to import due to a missing precedent. This suggests that the object itself or one of its dependencies (e.g., a data store or related entity) is either missing from the package or not present in the target environment.
Option A (Check whether the object (UUID ending in 18028821) is included in this package): This is the correct first action. Since the first error references this UUID, verifying its inclusion in the package is the logical starting point. If it's missing, the package export from the source environment was incomplete. If it's included but still fails, the precedent issue (e.g., a missing data store) needs further investigation.
Option B (Check whether the object (UUID ending in 7t00000i4e7a) is included in this package): This appears to be a typo or corrupted UUID (likely intended as something like "7t000014e7a" or similar), and it's not referenced in the primary error. It's mentioned later in the log but is not the first issue to address.
Option C (Check whether the object (UUID ending in 25606) is included in this package): This UUID is associated with a data store error later in the log, but it's not the first reported issue.
Option D (Check whether the object (UUID ending in 18028931) is included in this package): This UUID is mentioned in a subsequent error related to a process model or expression rule, but it's not the initial failure point.
Appian recommends addressing errors in the order they appear in the log to systematically resolve dependencies. Thus, starting with the object ending in 18028821 is the priority.

 

질문 # 26
What are two advantages of having High Availability (HA) for Appian Cloud applications?

• A. A typical Appian Cloud HA instance is composed of two active nodes.
• B. In the event of a system failure, your Appian instance will be restored and available to your users in less than 15 minutes, having lost no more than the last 1 minute worth of data.
• C. Data and transactions are continuously replicated across the active nodes to achieve redundancy and avoid single points of failure.
• D. In the event of a system failure, your Appian instance will be restored and available to your users in less than 15 minutes, having lost no more than the last 1 minute worth of data. This is an advantage of having HA, as it guarantees a high level of service availability and reliability for your Appian instance. If one of the nodes fails or becomes unavailable, the other node will take over and continue to serve requests without any noticeable downtime or data loss for your users.
• E. An Appian Cloud HA instance is composed of multiple active nodes running in different availability zones in different regions.

정답：B,C

설명：
The other options are incorrect for the following reasons:
A : An Appian Cloud HA instance is composed of multiple active nodes running in different availability zones in different regions. This is not an advantage of having HA, but rather a description of how HA works in Appian Cloud. An Appian Cloud HA instance consists of two active nodes running in different availability zones within the same region, not different regions.
C : A typical Appian Cloud HA instance is composed of two active nodes. This is not an advantage of having HA, but rather a description of how HA works in Appian Cloud. A typical Appian Cloud HA instance consists of two active nodes running in different availability zones within the same region, but this does not necessarily provide any benefit over having one active node. Verified Reference: Appian Documentation, section "High Availability".
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
High Availability (HA) in Appian Cloud is designed to ensure that applications remain operational and data integrity is maintained even in the face of hardware failures, network issues, or other disruptions. Appian's Cloud Architecture and HA documentation outline the benefits, focusing on redundancy, minimal downtime, and data protection. The question asks for two advantages, and the options must align with these core principles.
Option B (Data and transactions are continuously replicated across the active nodes to achieve redundancy and avoid single points of failure):
This is a key advantage of HA. Appian Cloud HA instances use multiple active nodes to replicate data and transactions in real-time across the cluster. This redundancy ensures that if one node fails, others can take over without data loss, eliminating single points of failure. This is a fundamental feature of Appian's HA setup, leveraging distributed architecture to enhance reliability, as detailed in the Appian Cloud High Availability Guide.
Option D (In the event of a system failure, your Appian instance will be restored and available to your users in less than 15 minutes, having lost no more than the last 1 minute worth of data):
This is another significant advantage. Appian Cloud HA is engineered to provide rapid recovery and minimal data loss. The Service Level Agreement (SLA) and HA documentation specify that in the case of a failure, the system failover is designed to complete within a short timeframe (typically under 15 minutes), with data loss limited to the last minute due to synchronous replication. This ensures business continuity and meets stringent uptime and data integrity requirements.
Option A (An Appian Cloud HA instance is composed of multiple active nodes running in different availability zones in different regions):
This is a description of the HA architecture rather than an advantage. While running nodes across different availability zones and regions enhances fault tolerance, the benefit is the resulting redundancy and availability, which are captured in Options B and D. This option is more about implementation than a direct user or operational advantage.
Option C (A typical Appian Cloud HA instance is composed of two active nodes):
This is a factual statement about the architecture but not an advantage. The number of nodes (typically two or more, depending on configuration) is a design detail, not a benefit. The advantage lies in what this setup enables (e.g., redundancy and quick recovery), as covered by B and D.
The two advantages-continuous replication for redundancy (B) and fast recovery with minimal data loss (D)-reflect the primary value propositions of Appian Cloud HA, ensuring both operational resilience and data integrity for users.
Reference:
The two advantages of having High Availability (HA) for Appian Cloud applications are:
B : Data and transactions are continuously replicated across the active nodes to achieve redundancy and avoid single points of failure. This is an advantage of having HA, as it ensures that there is always a backup copy of data and transactions in case one of the nodes fails or becomes unavailable. This also improves data integrity and consistency across the nodes, as any changes made to one node are automatically propagated to the other node.

 

질문 # 27
You need to connect Appian with LinkedIn to retrieve personal information about the users in your application. This information is considered private, and users should allow Appian to retrieve their information. Which authentication method would you recommend to fulfill this request?

• A. API Key Authentication
• B. Basic Authentication with dedicated account's login information
• C. OAuth 2.0: Authorization Code Grant
• D. Basic Authentication with user's login information

정답：C

설명：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
As an Appian Lead Developer, integrating with an external system like LinkedIn to retrieve private user information requires a secure, user-consented authentication method that aligns with Appian's capabilities and industry standards. The requirement specifies that users must explicitly allow Appian to access their private data, which rules out methods that don't involve user authorization. Let's evaluate each option based on Appian's official documentation and LinkedIn's API requirements:
A . API Key Authentication:
API Key Authentication involves using a single static key to authenticate requests. While Appian supports this method via Connected Systems (e.g., HTTP Connected System with an API key header), it's unsuitable here. API keys authenticate the application, not the user, and don't provide a mechanism for individual user consent. LinkedIn's API for private data (e.g., profile information) requires per-user authorization, which API keys cannot facilitate. Appian documentation notes that API keys are best for server-to-server communication without user context, making this option inadequate for the requirement.
B . Basic Authentication with user's login information:
This method uses a username and password (typically base64-encoded) provided by each user. In Appian, Basic Authentication is supported in Connected Systems, but applying it here would require users to input their LinkedIn credentials directly into Appian. This is insecure, impractical, and against LinkedIn's security policies, as it exposes user passwords to the application. Appian Lead Developer best practices discourage storing or handling user credentials directly due to security risks (e.g., credential leakage) and maintenance challenges. Moreover, LinkedIn's API doesn't support Basic Authentication for user-specific data access-it requires OAuth 2.0. This option is not viable.
C . Basic Authentication with dedicated account's login information:
This involves using a single, dedicated LinkedIn account's credentials to authenticate all requests. While technically feasible in Appian's Connected System (using Basic Authentication), it fails to meet the requirement that "users should allow Appian to retrieve their information." A dedicated account would access data on behalf of all users without their individual consent, violating privacy principles and LinkedIn's API terms. LinkedIn restricts such approaches, requiring user-specific authorization for private data. Appian documentation advises against blanket credentials for user-specific integrations, making this option inappropriate.
D . OAuth 2.0: Authorization Code Grant:
This is the recommended choice. OAuth 2.0 Authorization Code Grant, supported natively in Appian's Connected System framework, is designed for scenarios where users must authorize an application (Appian) to access their private data on a third-party service (LinkedIn). In this flow, Appian redirects users to LinkedIn's authorization page, where they grant permission. Upon approval, LinkedIn returns an authorization code, which Appian exchanges for an access token via the Token Request Endpoint. This token enables Appian to retrieve private user data (e.g., profile details) securely and per user. Appian's documentation explicitly recommends this method for integrations requiring user consent, such as LinkedIn, and provides tools like a!authorizationLink() to handle authorization failures gracefully. LinkedIn's API (e.g., v2 API) mandates OAuth 2.0 for personal data access, aligning perfectly with this approach.
Conclusion: OAuth 2.0: Authorization Code Grant (D) is the best method. It ensures user consent, complies with LinkedIn's API requirements, and leverages Appian's secure integration capabilities. In practice, you'd configure a Connected System in Appian with LinkedIn's Client ID, Client Secret, Authorization Endpoint (e.g., https://www.linkedin.com/oauth/v2/authorization), and Token Request Endpoint (e.g., https://www.linkedin.com/oauth/v2/accessToken), then use an Integration object to call LinkedIn APIs with the access token. This solution is scalable, secure, and aligns with Appian Lead Developer certification standards for third-party integrations.
Reference:
Appian Documentation: "Setting Up a Connected System with the OAuth 2.0 Authorization Code Grant" (Connected Systems).
Appian Lead Developer Certification: Integration Module (OAuth 2.0 Configuration and Best Practices).
LinkedIn Developer Documentation: "OAuth 2.0 Authorization Code Flow" (API Authentication Requirements).

 

질문 # 28
Review the following result of an explain statement:

Which two conclusions can you draw from this?

• A. The join between the tables order_detail, order and customer needs to be tine-tuned due to indices.
• B. The request is good enough to support a high volume of data. but could demonstrate some limitations if the developer queries information related to the product
• C. The worst join is the one between the table order_detail and customer
• D. The worst join is the one between the table order_detail and order.
• E. The join between the tables 0rder_detail and product needs to be fine-tuned due to Indices

정답：A,E

설명：
The provided image shows the result of an EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM ... query, which analyzes the execution plan for a SQL query joining tables order_detail, order, customer, and product from a business_schema. The key columns to evaluate are rows and filtered, which indicate the number of rows processed and the percentage of rows filtered by the query optimizer, respectively. The results are:
* order_detail: 155 rows, 100.00% filtered
* order: 122 rows, 100.00% filtered
* customer: 121 rows, 100.00% filtered
* product: 1 row, 100.00% filtered
The rows column reflects the estimated number of rows the MySQL optimizer expects to process for each table, while filtered indicates the efficiency of the index usage (100% filtered means no rows are excluded by the optimizer, suggesting poor index utilization or missing indices). According to Appian's Database Performance Guidelines and MySQL optimization best practices, high row counts with 100% filtered values indicate that the joins are not leveraging indices effectively, leading to full table scans, which degrade performance-especially with large datasets.
* Option C (The join between the tables order_detail, order, and customer needs to be fine-tuned due to indices):This is correct. The tables order_detail (155 rows), order (122 rows), and customer (121 rows) all show significant row counts with 100% filtering. This suggests that the joins between these tables (likely via foreign keys like order_number and customer_number) are not optimized. Fine-tuning requires adding or adjusting indices on the join columns (e.g., order_detail.order_number and order.
order_number) to reduce the row scan size and improve query performance.
* Option D (The join between the tables order_detail and product needs to be fine-tuned due to indices):This is also correct. The product table has only 1 row, but the 100% filtered value on order_detail (155 rows) indicates that the join (likely on product_code) is not using an index efficiently.
Adding an index on order_detail.product_code would help the optimizer filter rows more effectively, reducing the performance impact as data volume grows.
* Option A (The request is good enough to support a high volume of data, but could demonstrate some limitations if the developer queries information related to the product):This is partially misleading. The current plan shows inefficiencies across all joins, not just product-related queries. With
100% filtering on all tables, the query is unlikely to scale well with high data volumes without index optimization.
* Option B (The worst join is the one between the table order_detail and order):There's no clear evidence to single out this join as the worst. All joins show 100% filtering, and the row counts (155 and
122) are comparable to others, so this cannot be conclusively determined from the data.
* Option E (The worst join is the one between the table order_detail and customer):Similarly, there' s no basis to designate this as the worst join. The row counts (155 and 121) and filtering (100%) are consistent with other joins, indicating a general indexing issue rather than a specific problematic join.
The conclusions focus on the need for index optimization across multiple joins, aligning with Appian's emphasis on database tuning for integrated applications.
References:Appian Documentation - Database Integration and Performance, MySQL Documentation - EXPLAIN Statement Analysis, Appian Lead Developer Training - Query Optimization.
Below are the corrected and formatted questions based on your input, adhering to the requested format. The answers are 100% verified per official Appian Lead Developer documentation as of March 01, 2025, with comprehensive explanations and references provided.

 

질문 # 29
You are developing a case management application to manage support cases for a large set of sites. One of the tabs in this application s site Is a record grid of cases, along with Information about the site corresponding to that case. Users must be able to filter cases by priority level and status.
You decide to create a view as the source of your entity-backed record, which joins the separate case/site tables (as depicted in the following Image).

Which three column should be indexed?

• A. site_id
• B. modified_date
• C. name
• D. status
• E. priority
• F. case_id

정답：A,D,E

설명：
Indexing columns can improve the performance of queries that use those columns in filters, joins, or order by clauses. In this case, the columns that should be indexed are site_id, status, and priority, because they are used for filtering or joining the tables. Site_id is used to join the case and site tables, so indexing it will speed up the join operation. Status and priority are used to filter the cases by the user's input, so indexing them will reduce the number of rows that need to be scanned. Name, modified_date, and case_id do not need to be indexed, because they are not used for filtering or joining. Name and modified_date are only used for displaying information in the record grid, and case_id is only used as a unique identifier for each record.
Verified References: Appian Records Tutorial, Appian Best Practices
As an Appian Lead Developer, optimizing a database view for an entity-backed record grid requires indexing columns frequently used in queries, particularly for filtering and joining. The scenario involves a record grid displaying cases with site information, filtered by "priority level" and "status," and joined via the site_id foreign key. The image shows two tables (site and case) with a relationship via site_id. Let's evaluate each column based on Appian's performance best practices and query patterns:
* A. site_id:This is a primary key in the site table and a foreign key in the case table, used for joining the tables in the view. Indexing site_id in the case table (and ensuring it's indexed in site as a PK) optimizes JOIN operations, reducing query execution time for the record grid. Appian's documentation recommends indexing foreign keys in large datasets to improve query performance, especially for entity-backed records. This is critical for the join and must be included.
* B. status:Users filter cases by "status" (a varchar column in the case table). Indexing status speeds up filtering queries (e.g., WHERE status = 'Open') in the record grid, particularly with large datasets.
Appian emphasizes indexing columns used in WHERE clauses or filters to enhance performance, making this a key column for optimization. Since status is a common filter, it's essential.
* C. name:This is a varchar column in the site table, likely used for display (e.g., site name in the grid).
However, the scenario doesn't mention filtering or sorting by name, and it's not part of the join or required filters. Indexing name could improve searches if used, but it's not a priority given the focus on priority and status filters. Appian advises indexing only frequently queried or filtered columns to avoid unnecessary overhead, so this isn't necessary here.
* D. modified_date:This is a date column in the case table, tracking when cases were last updated. While useful for sorting or historical queries, the scenario doesn't specify filtering or sorting by modified_date in the record grid. Indexing it could help if used, but it's not critical for the current requirements.
Appian's performance guidelines prioritize indexing columns in active filters, making this lower priority than site_id, status, and priority.
* E. priority:Users filter cases by "priority level" (a varchar column in the case table). Indexing priority optimizes filtering queries (e.g., WHERE priority = 'High') in the record grid, similar to status. Appian' s documentation highlights indexing columns used in WHERE clauses for entity-backed records, especially with large datasets. Since priority is a specified filter, it's essential to include.
* F. case_id:This is the primary key in the case table, already indexed by default (as PKs are automatically indexed in most databases). Indexing it again is redundant and unnecessary, as Appian's Data Store configuration relies on PKs for unique identification but doesn't require additional indexing for performance in this context. The focus is on join and filter columns, not the PK itself.
Conclusion: The three columns to index are A (site_id), B (status), and E (priority). These optimize the JOIN (site_id) and filter performance (status, priority) for the record grid, aligning with Appian's recommendations for entity-backed records and large datasets. Indexing these columns ensures efficient querying for user filters, critical for the application's performance.
References:
* Appian Documentation: "Performance Best Practices for Data Stores" (Indexing Strategies).
* Appian Lead Developer Certification: Data Management Module (Optimizing Entity-Backed Records).
* Appian Best Practices: "Working with Large Data Volumes" (Indexing for Query Performance).

 

질문 # 30
......

우리DumpTOP의 덤프는 여러분이Appian ACD301인증시험응시에 도움이 되시라고 제공되는 것입니다, 우라DumpTOP에서 제공되는 학습가이드에는Appian ACD301인증시험관연 정보기술로 여러분이 이 분야의 지식 장악에 많은 도움이 될 것이며 또한 아주 정확한Appian ACD301시험문제와 답으로 여러분은 한번에 안전하게 시험을 패스하실 수 있습니다,Appian ACD301인증시험을 아주 높은 점수로 패스할 것을 보장해 드립니다,

ACD301참고자료: https://www.dumptop.com/Appian/ACD301-dump.html

• ACD301시험대비 공부 🧐 ACD301시험준비공부 🌮 ACD301최고품질 시험덤프자료 🎫 ▶ www.itdumpskr.com ◀웹사이트에서【 ACD301 】를 열고 검색하여 무료 다운로드ACD301최고품질 인증시험자료
• 시험대비 ACD301적중율 높은 시험덤프자료 최신버전 덤프데모 문제 🚺 시험 자료를 무료로 다운로드하려면➠ www.itdumpskr.com 🠰을 통해➤ ACD301 ⮘를 검색하십시오ACD301최신버전 시험덤프자료
• ACD301퍼펙트 최신버전 덤프 👫 ACD301시험준비공부 🏉 ACD301최신버전 시험자료 🚻 ⮆ www.exampassdump.com ⮄을(를) 열고「 ACD301 」를 검색하여 시험 자료를 무료로 다운로드하십시오ACD301최고품질 덤프데모 다운로드
• ACD301인기자격증 시험대비자료 🌎 ACD301퍼펙트 덤프샘플 다운로드 🏑 ACD301시험대비 공부 😿 「 www.itdumpskr.com 」을(를) 열고▷ ACD301 ◁를 입력하고 무료 다운로드를 받으십시오ACD301시험준비공부
• ACD301최신버전 시험자료 🍪 ACD301최신버전 시험자료 🚎 ACD301퍼펙트 덤프샘플 다운로드 🏭 무료 다운로드를 위해【 ACD301 】를 검색하려면[ www.itdumpskr.com ]을(를) 입력하십시오ACD301퍼펙트 공부자료
• ACD301인기자격증 시험대비자료 🆎 ACD301인기자격증 시험대비자료 💚 ACD301자격증공부 🤛 ⏩ www.itdumpskr.com ⏪웹사이트에서「 ACD301 」를 열고 검색하여 무료 다운로드ACD301시험대비 공부
• 시험대비 ACD301적중율 높은 시험덤프자료 최신버전 덤프데모 문제 ❤️ 「 www.exampassdump.com 」웹사이트에서➽ ACD301 🢪를 열고 검색하여 무료 다운로드ACD301최고품질 덤프데모 다운로드
• ACD301적중율 높은 덤프공부 📞 ACD301완벽한 덤프 🕐 ACD301인기자격증 시험대비자료 ✋ ⏩ ACD301 ⏪를 무료로 다운로드하려면⇛ www.itdumpskr.com ⇚웹사이트를 입력하세요ACD301인기자격증 시험덤프공부
• ACD301적중율 높은 시험덤프자료 최신 덤프문제보기 🧓 「 ACD301 」를 무료로 다운로드하려면▶ www.exampassdump.com ◀웹사이트를 입력하세요ACD301최신버전 시험덤프자료
• 최신 ACD301적중율 높은 시험덤프자료 시험대비 덤프공부 👦 지금☀ www.itdumpskr.com ️☀️에서【 ACD301 】를 검색하고 무료로 다운로드하세요ACD301적중율 높은 덤프공부
• 시험대비 ACD301적중율 높은 시험덤프자료 최신버전 덤프데모 문제 🛺 지금（ kr.fast2test.com ）을(를) 열고 무료 다운로드를 위해➽ ACD301 🢪를 검색하십시오ACD301최신 덤프샘플문제 다운
• ACD301 Exam Questions
• compassionate.training marklee599.ourcodeblog.com bsbd.info lms.mfdigitalbd.com www.lighthouseseal.com lms.acrosystemsinc.com geekfusion.net wponlineservices.com stunetgambia.com c-eir.org